Chapter 9: The Relativity of Hierarchies

Hierarchical Nesting: Emergence of Emergence

In previous chapters, we repeatedly saw a pattern: emergent new properties can become "elements" at a higher level, forming multi-level complex systems.

This chapter explores the nature of this hierarchical nesting and understands the relativity of hierarchies.

---

The Hierarchical Structure of the Universe

From Quarks to the Biosphere

Fundamental particles (quarks, electrons)
    ↓ Strong force, electromagnetic force
Atomic nucleus + electrons
    ↓ Electromagnetic force
Atoms
    ↓ Chemical bonds
Molecules
    ↓ Intermolecular forces
Supramolecular structures
    ↓ Self-organization
Organelles
    ↓ Biochemical networks
Cells
    ↓ Cell communication
Tissues
    ↓ Functional integration
Organs
    ↓ System coordination
Organ systems
    ↓ Neuroendocrine integration
Organisms
    ↓ Social interaction
Populations/Societies
    ↓ Ecological relationships
Ecosystems
    ↓ Biosphere dynamics
Biosphere

Each layer is the emergence of the layer below, while providing elements for the layer above.

---

The Relativity of Hierarchies

The Relativity of "Elements"

What counts as "basic elements" depends on the level of analysis:

For chemists: Atoms are basic elements
For physicists: Atoms are composed of more fundamental particles
For biologists: Cells are basic elements (atoms are too microscopic)
For sociologists: Individuals are basic elements (cells are too microscopic)

There is no absolute "basic," only "basic relative to the research question."

The Relativity of "Laws"

Each level has its own laws:

Physical laws ≠ Chemical laws ≠ Biological rules ≠ Psychological rules ≠ Social rules

Although higher-level laws are compatible with lower-level laws, higher-level laws have their own independent validity.

---

Reduction and Anti-Reduction

The Promise of Reductionism

Reductionism holds that:

Higher-level phenomena can in principle be completely explained in lower-level language

For example:

• Chemistry can be reduced to physics
• Biology can be reduced to chemistry
• Psychology can be reduced to neuroscience

The Difficulties of Reduction

In practice, complete reduction faces enormous difficulties:

1. Computational Complexity

Even if reduction is possible in principle, actual computation is infeasible:

• Predicting protein folding requires simulating every atom
• But proteins have thousands of atoms
• Complete simulation would take longer than the age of the universe

2. Incompleteness of Explanation

Lower-level descriptions cannot capture higher-level meaning:

• Knowing all neural firing patterns
• Still cannot understand the meaning of "pain" or "joy"

3. Multiple Realization

The same higher-level function can be realized by different lower-level implementations:

• Flight can be achieved by bird wings, airplane wings, helicopter rotors
• Computation can be done by silicon chips, neurons, even water waves

---

Chapter Summary

1. The universe exhibits a multi-level nested structure
2. "Elements," "laws," and "emergence" are all relative to the level
3. Reductionism is valuable but limited; complete reduction is usually infeasible
4. Downward causation is real and can be understood as boundary condition constraints
5. Different sciences study different levels; complexity science studies cross-level patterns
6. Choosing the right level of analysis is key to effective research and intervention

---

Questions for Reflection

1. Why can we say "chemistry can be reduced to physics" while also saying "chemistry has its own laws"? Is this contradictory?

2. What's wrong with the statement "consciousness is just neurons firing"? Analyze from the hierarchy perspective.

3. If everything is ultimately determined by physical laws, does "free will" still have meaning? How does the hierarchy perspective help us think about this?

4. Choose a problem you care about. List which different levels it can be analyzed from, and what insights each level provides.